SMF - Just Installed!
Quote from: retiredcaps on March 31, 2013, 06:25:33 PMIn the Uni-t UT61E part 4 episode, Martin said he would test the UT61E to see if the calibration holds or not (i.e drift).Initial readings were taken Nov 9, 2012, calibrated on Nov 20 and shootout was done Mar 31, 2013.From his videos.Code: [Select]Initial Calibrated Shootout0.2496 0.2499 0.24961.4990 1.5005 1.49924.995 5.000 4.9957.743 7.751 7.7449.942 9.953 9.943Now I realize the temperature might be different during all the periods, but it looks like the UT61E has drifted back to almost its original values as tested on Nov 9 (4 months ago).In addition, a sample size of 1 isn't exactly scientific.Thanks for that info! That was crossing my mind during the review and I always wondered about temperature playing a part. But as I recall, someone else that has one said they seemed to drift. I will keep an eye on that and perhaps do some follow-up as it might be relevant to some folks.
In the Uni-t UT61E part 4 episode, Martin said he would test the UT61E to see if the calibration holds or not (i.e drift).Initial readings were taken Nov 9, 2012, calibrated on Nov 20 and shootout was done Mar 31, 2013.From his videos.Code: [Select]Initial Calibrated Shootout0.2496 0.2499 0.24961.4990 1.5005 1.49924.995 5.000 4.9957.743 7.751 7.7449.942 9.953 9.943Now I realize the temperature might be different during all the periods, but it looks like the UT61E has drifted back to almost its original values as tested on Nov 9 (4 months ago).In addition, a sample size of 1 isn't exactly scientific.
Initial Calibrated Shootout0.2496 0.2499 0.24961.4990 1.5005 1.49924.995 5.000 4.9957.743 7.751 7.7449.942 9.953 9.943